The goal of this post is to show what a real structural inspection of a house in Bulgaria looks like before purchase — what I look for and how I act in the client’s interest.
A man from abroad contacted me after reading my blog articles on repairs and purchase assistance. We agreed that I would check a house in a village near Svishtov that he liked and wanted to buy.
The photos were taken in autumn. For most of the year, Bulgaria has sunny, warm weather, so the landscape usually appears brighter than in these images. If you are looking for a property for year-round use, do visits and inspections in the fall and winter so as not to be deceived by the greenery and good weather.
The trip was long — three and a half hours from Sofia. When the new Hemus highway is completed, it will be faster, but for now the route is relatively slow. The village lies about twenty kilometres from Svishtov, in a flat, quiet part of northern Bulgaria. The streets are wide and the yards large — often one and a half or two decares. People build wherever they like; rules about distance from neighbours are rarely followed, but that’s typical for most villages in this region of Bulgaria.
The yards are large in Northern Bulgaria — often one and a half or two decares. Photo: MG Construct.
The woman mediating the sale was an interesting figure — a Romanian in her forties who speaks good Bulgarian. About ten years ago, she and her husband discovered the village by chance, liked it, and bought a house. They work online and enjoy the quiet life there. Later she created a small agency helping other foreigners find property in the area. Her website even says, “We’re looking for neighbours.” She greets people as friends and speaks openly about prices and property conditions. The local owners are equally straightforward, so buyers can learn the full history of the house — and its technical details.
The house has a large yard — about one and a half decares, with an old grapevine, fruit trees, outbuildings, and space for firewood and a garden. It’s the kind of yard that once had animals and vegetables; the current owner confirmed that it used to be full of fruit and produce.
The house itself dates from the 1960s — brick-built, with architectural details typical for the time. The bricks are locally made and still solid, but the masonry is “homemade”: lime mortar, poorly bonded joints, and cracks near corners and T-junctions. The unplastered farm buildings in the yard are built with clay mortar — traditional for villages in this area.
The roof structure is wooden, with thin beams and undressed logs simply stripped of bark. The attic floor is sealed with compacted clay — an old but effective insulation method. There were traces of leakage on the beams and a lot of dust and debris from past repairs. One chimney has been cut below roof level and is no longer in use; if needed, it can be extended with a pipe and turned into a vent.
Cracks near corners and T-junctions. Photo: MG Construct.
There were traces of leakage on the beams and a lot of dust and debris from past repairs. Photo: MG Construct.
This is a typical house with life left in it — but it needs strengthening. I recommended the most economical and reliable method: reinforcing the walls with mesh and a cement-based repair mortar. When the foundations are solid (as in this case), the structure can become sufficiently strong for long-term use without losing its authentic character and without new foundations being dug.
The roof may last another year or two but shall be completely replaced for year-round living.
On the north side there was an addition with a poorly made reinforced concrete slab. My recommendation for that part was categorical — full demolition, not repair, due to risk of collapse.
The electrical supply is three-phase — an advantage not every village house has. Water supply exists and the water meter is present. Most properties in the area have or once had wells, often two for safety. On this site, one was dry but the other still held water.
There is no sewerage. Wastewater usually goes into a pit dug in the ground and then seeps away. The existing septic tank is currently unused, but in the future a small biological treatment unit and a buffer tank for purified water (usable for irrigation) would be advisable.
I didn’t need to use all my technical tools to assess the condition of the house and infrastructure, nor to establish a video link with the client for clarifications. After the inspection I wrote a detailed report based on my notes and sent it to him as soon as possible — while everything was still fresh in memory.
Based on that report, my client was able to realistically evaluate whether the house met his needs — from over 2,000 kilometres away.